Skip to main content
OrgX runs a specialist agent system: one orchestrator coordinates six domain agents.
This is deliberate. It reduces context loss, improves output quality, and gives you clearer control over approvals.

Questions This Page Answers

  • Which OrgX agents are real and supported right now?
  • What each agent is best at, and when it should be selected
  • Why specialist routing beats a single generic assistant
  • How autonomy, trust, and budget controls affect agent execution

Why Specialist Agents Win

  • Higher quality per domain: Engineering, product, design, sales, marketing, and operations have different success criteria.
  • Less rework: The orchestrator routes tasks to the right specialist first instead of letting one model guess.
  • Faster review loops: Decision cards are easier to approve when the right agent produced the artifact.
  • Safer autonomy: Trust and budget controls are applied per agent capability, not as one global “on/off.”

Canonical Agent Domains

Engineering Agent (`engineering-agent`)

Best for: implementation, bug fixes, refactors, tests, PR-ready diffs.

How Selection Works

Multi-Agent Patterns (Common)

  • product-agentengineering-agent: plan first, then implement.
  • design-agentengineering-agent: spec clarity before code.
  • marketing-agent + sales-agent: aligned narrative from top funnel to close.
  • operations-agent + orchestrator-agent: unblock and stabilize stalled execution.

Governance: Trust, Autonomy, Budget

Check trust state:
Start bounded autonomous execution:

What Agents Do Not Do

  • They do not access tools you have not connected.
  • They do not bypass your decision policy unless you explicitly allow it.
  • They do not spend beyond configured guardrails.
  • They do not cross workspace boundaries.

Next Steps

Decisions

See how approvals, escalations, and blocker resolution work.

Architecture

Understand how agents, MCP, and org graph execution fit together.