Questions This Page Answers
- When should a decision be created instead of auto-shipping?
- What is the fastest safe way to triage pending decisions?
- How do decision outcomes improve future agent behavior?
- What autonomy settings reduce noise without losing control?
Why Decisions?
Agents are powerful, but they shouldn’t operate unchecked. Decisions ensure:- Quality: Human review catches errors before they ship
- Alignment: You stay in control of strategic direction
- Trust: Build confidence in agents incrementally
- Compliance: Maintain audit trail for governance
The goal isn’t to slow agents down—it’s to keep you in the loop on what
matters while agents handle the routine work.
Decision Types
- Approval
- Escalation
- Clarification
- Conflict
Approval Decision
Agent completed work and needs sign-off before shipping.
- PR ready for merge
- Campaign brief ready to send
- Outreach sequence ready to launch
- Approve: Ship the artifact
- Reject: Send back with feedback
- Edit: Modify before approving
Decision Anatomy
Every decision includes:Decision Card UI
In the Mission Control, decisions render as actionable cards:Decision Flow
Urgency Levels
Decisions are prioritized by urgency:| Level | Description | SLA | Notification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | Blocking production or revenue | 1 hour | Push + email + SMS |
| High | Blocking other work | 4 hours | Push + email |
| Medium | Should handle today | 24 hours | Push |
| Low | Can batch with others | 72 hours | Badge only |
Urgency Triggers
Urgency is set based on:- Time sensitivity: Deadlines, SLAs
- Dependencies: Is other work blocked?
- Impact: Revenue, users, compliance
- Agent confidence: Low confidence → higher urgency
Decision Queue
Access decisions from multiple surfaces:Mission Control
Primary decision queue with full context and batch actions.
ChatGPT
Review and approve via natural conversation.
Slack
Coming soon: Approve directly in Slack threads.
Email Digest
Daily summary of pending decisions.
Batch Actions
In Mission Control, you can batch-approve similar decisions:- Select multiple decisions
- Review the batch summary
- Approve all with a single note
Autonomy Settings
Configure when decisions are required:Per-Agent Settings
Autonomy Levels
| Level | Decisions Created | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Shadow | Every action | Learning mode |
| Tutor | Every action with explanation | Training |
| Supervised | All artifacts before shipping | Default |
| Autonomous | Only when budget/scope exceeded | Trusted workflows |
| Full Auto | None (dangerous) | Low-risk automation only |
Adjusting Autonomy
- Go to Settings → Agents
- Select the agent type
- Adjust the autonomy slider
- Optionally set budget thresholds
- Save changes
Autonomous Sessions
At the Autonomous or Full Auto level, you can start budget-bounded sessions that run while you’re away:- Set
max_cost_usdandmax_receiptsto cap spending - Agents work through the IWMT task queue automatically
- Every action generates a receipt in the value ledger
- Review all session output the next morning with
orgx_recommend
Decision Analytics & the Flywheel
Track decision patterns in Mission Control. Every decision outcome feeds the Intelligence Flywheel, improving agent quality over time.Metrics
| Metric | Description |
|---|---|
| Approval Rate | % of decisions approved vs rejected |
| Time to Decision | Average time from creation to resolution |
| Escalation Rate | % of decisions that are escalations |
| Edit Rate | % of approvals that required edits |
How Decisions Feed the Flywheel
- Approvals increase agent trust for that capability, potentially unlocking higher autonomy
- Rejections with feedback become org learnings that prevent repeat mistakes
- Quality scores from
record_quality_scoreweight future trust calculations - Morning brief value signals via
orgx_recommendtrack the ROI and downstream impact of approved decisions
Proactive Sentinels
Decisions that go unresolved trigger proactive sentinels:- Pending Decision Sentinel: Escalates decisions waiting too long
- Blocked Workstream Sentinel: Creates decisions when workstreams are stuck waiting
- Stale Initiative Sentinel: Flags initiatives with no recent activity
Insights
High edit rate might indicate:- Agent prompts need improvement
- Task descriptions are unclear
- Verification checks are too lenient
- Agent selection is wrong for task type
- Autonomy settings are too aggressive
- Context is insufficient
Best Practices
Check Agent Reasoning First
Check Agent Reasoning First
Before looking at the artifact, read the agent’s reasoning. It helps you
understand the approach and catch logical errors early.
Provide Feedback on Rejections
Provide Feedback on Rejections
When rejecting, always include feedback. This helps the agent (and the system)
learn what you want. Vague rejections lead to repeated mistakes.
Use Edit Sparingly
Use Edit Sparingly
If you frequently edit before approving, consider: - Improving task
descriptions - Adjusting agent prompts - Adding constraints to the workflow
spec
Don't Let Decisions Pile Up
Don't Let Decisions Pile Up
Stale decisions block agent work. Set aside time daily to clear your decision
queue, or delegate to team members.
Review Escalations Carefully
Review Escalations Carefully
Escalation decisions often reveal gaps in your autonomy settings. After
resolving, consider whether to adjust settings to prevent repeat
escalations.
Decision API
For programmatic access, use the decisions API:orgx_decide remains available as a compatibility alias for older clients, but new integrations should prefer orgx_search.
Next Steps
Agents
Understand how agents create decisions.
Artifacts
Learn about the outputs decisions approve.
